Aortic dissection is the most common form of the acute aortic syndromes and a type of arterial dissection. It occurs when blood enters the medial layer of the aortic wall through a tear or penetrating ulcer in the intima and tracks along the media, forming a second blood-filled channel within the wall.
The majority of aortic dissections are seen in elderly hypertensive patients. In a very small minority, an underlying connective tissue disorder may be present. Other conditions or predisposing factors may also be encountered, in which case they will be reflected in the demographics. Examples include 5:
- structural aortic abnormalities
- Turner syndrome
- intra-aortic balloon pumps 7
- ciprofloxacin use (unclear if class effect for fluoroquinolone agents) 20
- fluoroquinolones seem to promote loss of extracellular matrix integrity, by several mechanisms
- in the UK caution is now advised in using these agents in high-risk patients 21
The duration of aortic dissection is arbitrarily categorized into three phases 18,19:
- acute: within 14 days of first symptom onset
- subacute: between 14 days to 3 months
- chronic: more than 3 months from the initial onset of symptoms
Patients are often hypertensive (although they may be normotensive or hypotensive) and present with anterior or posterior chest pain and a tearing sensation in the chest. There may be a difference in blood pressure between the two arms depending on where the dissection occurs.
Depending on the extent of dissection and occlusion of aortic branches, end-organ ischemia may also be present (seen in up to 27% of cases) 5, including:
- abdominal organ ischemia
- limb ischemia
- ischemic or embolic stroke
- paraplegia: involvement of the artery of Adamkiewicz
If the aortic dissection involves the aortic root it may result in involvement of the coronary arteries and can present similarly to ST-elevation myocardial infarction on an ECG. However, treating these patients with antiplatelets/anticoagulation could be disastrous in aortic dissection.
Some cases of aortic dissection may result in rupture, causing collapse and often death. Signs of cardiac tamponade (Beck's triad) may also be encountered if rupture occurs into the pericardial space.
There have been efforts to construct a clinical decision rule stratify risk of acute aortic dissection and avoid over-investigation. The aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) combined with a negative d-dimer test has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing unnecessary exams, however, it has not been widely accepted into clinical practice and requires further validation 13,14.
The normal lumen lined by intima is called the true lumen and the blood-filled channel in the media is called the false lumen. In most cases the vessel wall is abnormal. Causes include:
- hypertension (pathogenesis: medial degeneration)
- inherited connective tissue disorders (pathogenesis: medial degeneration)
- atherosclerosis (pathogenesis: penetrating ulcer)
- vasculitis (pathogenesis: inflammation)
- pregnancy (pathogenesis: unknown)
- iatrogenic: aortic catheterization, intra-aortic balloon pump
Imaging is essential in delineating the morphology and extent of the dissection as well as allowing for classification (which dictates management). Two classification systems are in common usage, both of which divide dissections according to the involvement of the ascending aorta:
In recent years, the Stanford classification has gained favor with cardiothoracic surgeons. Approximately 60% of dissections involve the ascending aorta (Stanford A or DeBakey I and II) 5.
Aortic dissection is may sometimes be classified as communicating versus non-communicating 16,17.
A new classification system was proposed which is referred with the acronym DISSECT (duration, intimal tear, size of the dissected aorta, the segmental extent of involvement, clinical complications, and thrombosis of the false lumen) 18.
Chest radiography may be normal or demonstrate a number of suggestive findings, including:
- widened mediastinum: > 8.0-8.8 cm at the level of the aortic knob on portable anteroposterior chest radiographs 9,10, although this upper limit of normal varies (may be significantly larger) depending on projection, FFD and x-ray cassette positioning 15
- double aortic contour
- irregular aortic contour
- inward displacement of atherosclerotic calcification (>1 cm from the aortic margin) 9,11
Depending on etiology, there may be signs of periaortic or mediastinal hematoma which include:
- obscuration of the aortic knob
- opacification of the AP window
- deviation of mediastinal structures
- esophagus or NGT to the right
- trachea to the right
- left main bronchus inferiorly (decreased angle from the horizontal)
- increased thickness of the left and/or right paratracheal stripe
- apical capping, particularly on the left
CT, especially with arterial contrast enhancement (CTA) is the investigation of choice, able not only to diagnose and classify the dissection but also to evaluate for distal complications. It has reported sensitivity and specificity of nearly 100% 3,5.
Non-contrast CT may demonstrate only subtle findings; however, a high-density mural hematoma is often visible. Displacement of atherosclerotic calcification into the lumen is also a frequently identified finding.
Dissections involving the aortic root should ideally be assessed with ECG-gated CTA which nearly totally eliminates pulsation artefact. Pulsation artefact can mimic dissection, is very common and seen in up to 92% of non-gated CTA studies 8.
Contrast-enhanced CT (preferably CTA) gives excellent detail. Findings include 1-3,5:
- intimal flap
- dilatation of the aorta
- complications (see below)
- an atypical variant that may be seen is an aortic intramural hematoma
- Mercedes-Benz sign in the case of a "triple-barreled" dissection
- windsock sign
The CTA-report should include at least:
- proximal and distal extent of dissection
- location of the intimal tear
- aortic size
- involvement and supply (from true or false lumen) of aortic branches
- signs of organ ischemia or vessel occlusion
An essential part of the assessment of aortic dissection is identifying the true lumen, as the placement of an endoluminal stent-graft in the false lumen can have dire consequences. Distinguishing between the two is often straightforward, but in some instances, no clear continuation of one lumen with normal artery can be identified. In such instances, a number of features are helpful 3:
- often compressed by the false lumen and the smaller of the two
- outer wall calcifications (helpful in acute dissections)
- origin of the celiac trunk, SMA and right renal artery usually arise from the true lumen
- often larger lumen size due to higher false luminal pressures
- at risk for rupture due to reduced elastic recoil and dilation
- beak sign
- cobweb sign (as slender linear areas of low attenuation specific to the false lumen due to residual ribbons of media that have incompletely sheared away during the dissection process) 3
- often of lower contrast density due to delayed opacification
- maybe thrombosed and seen as mural low density only (more common in chronic dissections)
- the left renal artery usually arises from the false lumen
- surrounds true lumen in Stanford type A
Chronic dissection flaps are often thicker and straighter than those seen in acute dissections 3.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) has very high sensitivity and specificity for assessment of acute aortic dissection, but due to limited access and its invasive nature, it has largely been replaced by CTA (or MRA in some instances) 5.
Although in general MRA has been reserved for follow-up examinations, rapid non-contrast imaging techniques (e.g. true FISP) may see MRI having a larger role to play in the acute diagnosis, particularly in patients with impaired renal function 4. It has similar sensitivity and specificity to CTA and TOE 5 but suffers from limited availability and the difficulties inherent in performing MRI on acutely unwell patients.
DSA - angiography
Conventional digital subtraction angiography has historically been the gold standard investigation. CTA has now replaced it as the first-line investigation, not only due to it being non-invasive but also on account of better delineation of the poorly opacifying false lumen, intramural hematoma and end-organ ischemia.
Angiography still is required for endoluminal repair.
Risks of angiography include general risks of angiography plus the risk of catheterizing the false lumen and causing aortic rupture.
Treatment and prognosis
- aggressive blood pressure control with beta-blockers as they reduce both blood pressure and also heart rate hence reduce extra pressure on the aortic wall
- immediate surgical repair (for type A dissection or complicated type B dissection)
Complications of all types of aortic dissection include:
- dissection and occlusion of branch vessels
- abdominal organ ischemia
- limb ischemia
- ischemic stroke
- paraplegia: involvement of artery of Adamkiewicz
- distal thromboembolism
- aneurysmal dilatation: this is an indication for endovascular or surgical intervention 6
- aortic rupture
A Stanford type A dissection may also result in:
- coronary artery occlusion
- aortic incompetence
- rupture into the pericardial sac with resulting cardiac tamponade
Although the combination of blood pressure control and surgical intervention has significantly lowered in-hospital mortality, it remains significant, at 10-35%. Over the 10 years following diagnosis another 15-30% of patients require surgery for life-threatening complications 5.
The differential on chest x-ray is that of a dilated thoracic aorta.
On CT, a number of entities that can mimic a dissection should be considered 5:
- pseudodissection due to aortic pulsation motion artefact (typically left anterior and right posterior aspects of the ascending aorta)
- pseudodissection due to contrast streaks
- mural thrombus
- intramural hematoma: really an atypical type of aortic dissection and part of the acute aortic syndrome
- penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer which is part of the acute aortic syndrome
- adjacent atelectasis
- minimal aortic injury
Clinically, a number of causes of acute chest pain are often considered:
- 1. Sebastià C, Pallisa E, Quiroga S et-al. Aortic dissection: diagnosis and follow-up with helical CT. Radiographics. 19 (1): 45-60. Radiographics (full text) - Pubmed citation
- 2. Weissleder R, Wittenberg J, Harisinghani MG. Primer of diagnostic imaging. Mosby Inc. (2007) ISBN:0323040683. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 3. Lepage MA, Quint LE, Sonnad SS et-al. Aortic dissection: CT features that distinguish true lumen from false lumen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177 (1): 207-11. AJR Am J Roentgenol (full text) - Pubmed citation
- 4. Pereles FS, Mccarthy RM, Baskaran V et-al. Thoracic aortic dissection and aneurysm: evaluation with nonenhanced true FISP MR angiography in less than 4 minutes. Radiology. 2002;223 (1): 270-4. doi:10.1148/radiol.2231010966 - Pubmed citation
- 5. Macura KJ, Corl FM, Fishman EK et-al. Pathogenesis in acute aortic syndromes: aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic aortic ulcer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181 (2): 309-16. AJR Am J Roentgenol (full text) - Pubmed citation
- 6. Blount KJ, Hagspiel KD. Aortic diameter, true lumen, and false lumen growth rates in chronic type B aortic dissection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192 (5): W222-9. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3986 - Pubmed citation
- 7. Hurwitz LM, Goodman PC. Intraaortic balloon pump location and aortic dissection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184 (4): 1245-6. AJR Am J Roentgenol (citation) - Pubmed citation
- 8. Ko SF, Hsieh MJ, Chen MC et-al. Effects of heart rate on motion artifacts of the aorta on non-ECG-assisted 0.5-sec thoracic MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184 (4): 1225-30. doi:10.2214/ajr.184.4.01841225 - Pubmed citation
- 9. de Lacey G, Morley S et-al. The Chest X-Ray: A Survival Guide. Saunders Ltd. ISBN:0702030465. Read it at Google Books - Find it at Amazon
- 10. Lai V, Tsang WK, Chan WC et-al. Diagnostic accuracy of mediastinal width measurement on posteroanterior and anteroposterior chest radiographs in the depiction of acute nontraumatic thoracic aortic dissection. Emerg Radiol. 2012;19 (4): 309-15. doi:10.1007/s10140-012-1034-3 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 11. Gartland S, Sookur D, Lee H. Aortic dissection: an x ray sign. Emerg Med J. 2007;24 (4): 310. doi:10.1136/emj.2006.037010 - Free text at pubmed - Pubmed citation
- 12. McMahon MA, Squirrell CA. Multidetector CT of Aortic Dissection: A Pictorial Review. (2010) Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 30 (2): 445-60. doi:10.1148/rg.302095104 - Pubmed
- 13. Nazerian P, Mueller C et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-Dimer for Acute Aortic Syndromes: The ADvISED Prospective Multicenter Study. (2018) Circulation. 137 (3): 250-258.
- 14. Rogers AM, Hermann LK et al. Sensitivity of the aortic dissection detection risk score, a novel guideline-based tool for identification of acute aortic dissection at initial presentation: results from the international registry of acute aortic dissection. (2011) Circulation. 123 (20): 2213-8.
- 15. Gleeson CE, Spedding RL, Harding LA, et al The mediastinum—Is it wide? Emergency Medicine Journal 2001;18:183-185.
- 16. Akutsu K, Yoshino H, Tobaru T, Hagiya K, Watanabe Y, Tanaka K, Koyama N, Yamamoto T, Nagao K, Takayama M. Acute type B aortic dissection with communicating vs. non-communicating false lumen. (2015) Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 79 (3): 567-73. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0828 - Pubmed
- 17. Srichai MB, Lieber ML, Lytle BW, Kasper JM, White RD. Acute dissection of the descending aorta: noncommunicating versus communicating forms. (2004) The Annals of thoracic surgery. 77 (6): 2012-20; discussion 2020. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.08.030 - Pubmed
- 18. Dake MD, Thompson M, van Sambeek M, Vermassen F, Morales JP. DISSECT: a new mnemonic-based approach to the categorization of aortic dissection. (2013) European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 46 (2): 175-90. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.04.029 - Pubmed
- 19. Saremi F, Hassani C, Lin LM, Lee C, Wilcox AG, Fleischman F, Cunningham MJ. Image Predictors of Treatment Outcome after Thoracic Aortic Dissection Repair. (2018) Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 38 (7): 1949-1972. doi:10.1148/rg.2018180025 - Pubmed
- 20. Pasternak B, Inghammar M, Svanström H. Fluoroquinolone use and risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection: nationwide cohort study. (2018) BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 360: k678. doi:10.1136/bmj.k678 - Pubmed
- 21 GOV.UK. (2018). Systemic and inhaled fluoroquinolones: small increased risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection; advice for prescribing in high-risk patients. [online] Available at: https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/systemic-and-inhaled-fluoroquinolones-small-increased-risk-of-aortic-aneurysm-and-dissection-advice-for-prescribing-in-high-risk-patients [Accessed 22 Jun. 2019].
Related Radiopaedia articles
- acute aortic syndrome
- thoracic aortic aneurysm
- abdominal aortic aneurysm
- endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)
- reporting tips for aortic aneurysms
- aortic coarctation
- aortic pseudocoarctation
- cervical aortic arch
- interrupted aortic arch
- transposition of the great arteries
- variant anatomy of the aortic arch
- traumatic aortic injury