Modified Ringertz grading system for diffuse astrocytomas

Changed by Frank Gaillard, 4 Jul 2016

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

TheThe Modified modified Ringertz grading system is has historically been one of the more frequently used grading systems for diffuse astrocytomas, only second tobut has not essentially been replaced by the WHO grading system.

Unlike the WHO grading system and St Anne-Mayo grading system (also known as the Dumas-Duport grading sustemsystem) which divide astrocytomas into 4 grades, the Ringertz grading system only has 3 grades, and only applies to diffuse astrocytomas (i.e. not WHO grade 1 tumours such as pilocytic astrocytomas or subependymal giant cell astrocytomas) 1

As such there is a rough equivalence between WHO II - IV and modified Ringertz I - III, although there are some differences in the criteria required to fulfil various grades. 

The modified Ringertz grading system is as follows 2:

  • grade 1 = astrocytoma
    • roughly equivalent to WHO grade II
    • mild hypercellularity
    • mild nuclear atypia (nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, pleomorphism) 
    • rare mitotic figures
  • grade 2 = anaplastic astrocytoma 
    • roughly equivalent to WHO grade III
    • more cellular than grade 2
    • more nuclear atypia 
    • more mitotic figures
    • endothelial proliferation (note this is a WHO grade IV feature)
  • grade 3 = glioblastoma
    • roughly equivalent to WHO grade IV
    • presence of geographic necrosis +/- surrounding pseduopalisading tumour cells

History and etymology

Ringertz originally proposed the grading system in 1950 4

  • -<p><strong>The Modified Ringertz grading system</strong> is one of the more frequently used grading systems for <a href="/articles/low-grade-infiltrative-astrocytoma">diffuse astrocytomas</a>, only second to the <a href="/articles/who-grading-system-for-diffuse-astrocytomas">WHO grading system</a>. Unlike the WHO grading system and <a href="/articles/st-anne-mayo-astrocytoma-grading-system">St Anne-Mayo grading system</a> (also known as the Dumas-Duport grading sustem) which divide astrocytomas into 4 grades, the Ringertz grading system only has 3 grades, and only applies to diffuse astrocytomas (i.e. not WHO grade 1 tumours such as <a href="/articles/pilocytic-astrocytoma">pilocytic astrocytomas</a> or <a href="/articles/subependymal-giant-cell-astrocytoma">subependymal giant cell astrocytomas</a>) <sup>1</sup>. </p><p>As such there is a rough equivalence between WHO II - IV and modified Ringertz I - III, although there are some differences in the criteria required to fulfil various grades. </p><p>The modified Ringertz grading system is as follows <sup>2</sup>:</p><ul>
  • +<p>The<strong> modified Ringertz grading system</strong> has historically been one of the more frequently used grading systems for <a href="/articles/low-grade-infiltrative-astrocytoma">diffuse astrocytomas</a>, but has not essentially been replaced by the <a href="/articles/who-grading-system-for-diffuse-astrocytomas">WHO grading system</a>.</p><p>Unlike the WHO grading system and <a href="/articles/st-anne-mayo-astrocytoma-grading-system">St Anne-Mayo grading system</a> (also known as the Dumas-Duport grading system) which divide astrocytomas into 4 grades, the Ringertz grading system only has 3 grades, and only applies to diffuse astrocytomas (i.e. not WHO grade 1 tumours such as <a href="/articles/pilocytic-astrocytoma">pilocytic astrocytomas</a> or <a href="/articles/subependymal-giant-cell-astrocytoma">subependymal giant cell astrocytomas</a>) <sup>1</sup>. </p><p>As such there is a rough equivalence between WHO II - IV and modified Ringertz I - III, although there are some differences in the criteria required to fulfil various grades. </p><p>The modified Ringertz grading system is as follows <sup>2</sup>:</p><ul>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.