Cognitive bias in diagnostic radiology
Updates to Article Attributes
Cognitive biases have a complex and significant impact on the perception of examinations within diagnostic radiology, with the clear and present danger of diagnostic errors. The following are some of the more common cognitive biases that can affect day-to-day decision making 1.
Anchoring bias
Anchoring bias is the tendency for one to focus on salient evidence upon the initial stages of the diagnosis leading to the diagnosis. Anchoring bias can also be heuristic in nature.
Automation bias
Automation bias is the tendency for reporters using computer-aided decision support to over rely on the software for the diagnosis, and ignoring their own opinions 2.
Availability bias
Availability bias is the process in which one is to pass judgement more frequently if this information is readily available in the mind.
Confirmation bias
Having a predetermined diagnosis in mind, then looking for evidence that supports this predetermined idea. Alliterative errors 3, sometimes referred to as satisfaction of report errors, are caused by the tendency to overvalue previous reports, can be conceptualized as a type of confirmation bias.
Hindsight bias
Hindsight bias occurs, when the difficulty of making the correct diagnostic decision by prior imaging is retrospectively de-emphasized, after the diagnosis has been proven. It is also informally termed as the the “I knew it all along” or "retrospectoscope" bias 5.
Representativeness bias
Making a judgement on an aspect of an image that is based on one's own perception of what that represents. Representativeness bias as the description suggest can also be heuristic in nature.
Search satisfaction
Search satisfaction is the tendency to cease a search early due to early findings satisfying the reader. Satisfaction of search (SOS) errors have been reported to account for 22% of diagnostic errors 4.
Framing bias
Framing bias is in which the reader is influenced by the clinical question. For example, a well-written request form detailing the exact pathology expected, may influence the reader's decision.
Outcome bias
A tendency to favour a less severe diagnosis based on empathy for a patient.
Zebra retreat bias
A reader will not make a rare diagnosis, which is otherwise supported by the available evidence due to a lack of confidence.
-<p><strong>Cognitive biases </strong>have a complex and significant impact on the perception of examinations within <strong>diagnostic radiology</strong>, with the clear and present danger of <a href="/articles/errors-in-diagnostic-radiology">diagnostic errors</a>. The following are some of the more common cognitive biases that can affect day-to-day decision making <sup>1</sup>.</p><h6>Anchoring bias</h6><p>Anchoring bias is the tendency for one to focus on salient evidence upon the initial stages of the diagnosis leading to the diagnosis. Anchoring bias can also be heuristic in nature.</p><h6>Automation bias</h6><p><a href="/articles/automation-bias">Automation bias</a> is the tendency for reporters using computer-aided decision support to over rely on the software for the diagnosis, and ignoring their own opinions <sup>2</sup>.</p><h6>Availability bias</h6><p>Availability bias is the process in which one is to pass judgement more frequently if this information is readily available in the mind.</p><h6>Confirmation bias</h6><p>Having a predetermined diagnosis in mind, then looking for evidence that supports this predetermined idea. Alliterative errors <sup>3</sup>, sometimes referred to as satisfaction of report errors, are caused by the tendency to overvalue previous reports, can be conceptualized as a type of confirmation bias.</p><h6>Hindsight bias</h6><p>Hindsight bias occurs, when the difficulty of making the correct diagnostic decision by prior imaging is retrospectively de-emphasized, after the diagnosis has been proven. It is also informally termed as the the “I knew it all along” or "retrospectoscope" bias <sup>5</sup>. </p><h6>Representativeness bias</h6><p>Making a judgement on an aspect of an image that is based on one's own perception of what that represents. Representativeness bias as the description suggest can also be heuristic in nature.</p><h6>Search satisfaction</h6><p>Search satisfaction is the tendency to cease a search early due to early findings satisfying the reader. <a href="/articles/satisfaction-of-search-error">Satisfaction of search (SOS) errors</a> have been reported to account for 22% of diagnostic errors <sup>4</sup>.</p><h6>Framing bias</h6><p>Framing bias is in which the reader is influenced by the clinical question. For example, a well-written request form detailing the exact pathology expected, may influence the reader's decision. </p><h6>Outcome bias</h6><p>A tendency to favour a less severe diagnosis based on empathy for a patient.</p><h6>Zebra retreat bias </h6><p>A reader will not make a rare diagnosis, which is otherwise supported by the available evidence due to a lack of confidence.</p>- +<p><strong>Cognitive biases </strong>have a complex and significant impact on the perception of examinations within <strong>diagnostic radiology</strong>, with the clear and present danger of <a href="/articles/errors-in-diagnostic-radiology">diagnostic errors</a>. The following are some of the more common cognitive biases that can affect day-to-day decision making <sup>1</sup>.</p><h6>Anchoring bias</h6><p>Anchoring bias is the tendency for one to focus on salient evidence upon the initial stages of the diagnosis leading to the diagnosis. Anchoring bias can also be heuristic in nature.</p><h6>Automation bias</h6><p><a href="/articles/automation-bias">Automation bias</a> is the tendency for reporters using computer-aided decision support to over rely on the software for the diagnosis, and ignoring their own opinions <sup>2</sup>.</p><h6>Availability bias</h6><p>Availability bias is the process in which one is to pass judgement more frequently if this information is readily available in the mind.</p><h6>Confirmation bias</h6><p>Having a predetermined diagnosis in mind, then looking for evidence that supports this predetermined idea. Alliterative errors <sup>3</sup>, sometimes referred to as satisfaction of report errors, are caused by the tendency to overvalue previous reports, can be conceptualized as a type of confirmation bias.</p><h6>Hindsight bias</h6><p>Hindsight bias occurs, when the difficulty of making the correct diagnostic decision by prior imaging is retrospectively de-emphasized, after the diagnosis has been proven. It is also informally termed as the “I knew it all along” or "retrospectoscope" bias <sup>5</sup>. </p><h6>Representativeness bias</h6><p>Making a judgement on an aspect of an image that is based on one's own perception of what that represents. Representativeness bias as the description suggest can also be heuristic in nature.</p><h6>Search satisfaction</h6><p>Search satisfaction is the tendency to cease a search early due to early findings satisfying the reader. <a href="/articles/satisfaction-of-search-error">Satisfaction of search (SOS) errors</a> have been reported to account for 22% of diagnostic errors <sup>4</sup>.</p><h6>Framing bias</h6><p>Framing bias is in which the reader is influenced by the clinical question. For example, a well-written request form detailing the exact pathology expected, may influence the reader's decision. </p><h6>Outcome bias</h6><p>A tendency to favour a less severe diagnosis based on empathy for a patient.</p><h6>Zebra retreat bias </h6><p>A reader will not make a rare diagnosis, which is otherwise supported by the available evidence due to a lack of confidence.</p>
Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.