Getting started for new editors

This article is aimed at new editors to assist them in getting started. 

The role of editors is to support the senior and managing editors in the day-to-day content review as well as special projects. Everybody has a different amount of time they can volunteer on Radiopaedia.org but as a rule of thumb, at least a weekly contribution is expected.

Editorial process

Every edit on Radiopaedia.org is listed on the all edits page and its status as being reviewed is indicated by a green thumbs up (positive review), sideways finger, or a red thumbs down (negative review):

• green thumbs up:near perfect
  • articles: no or minor editing required; fits within the style guide; correct spelling, grammar and punctuation; correctly referenced
  • cases: patient confidentiality and privacy maintained; correct diagnosis; correct spelling, grammar and punctuation
  • not to be used for minor edits (e.g. fixing a spelling mistake)
• red neutral: approve
  • ​generally happy with the contribution, but there are some minor style guide issues (e.g. spelling, punctuation, style, capitalisation) that prevent it from being "near perfect"
• thumbs down: everything else
  • for every red thumbs down you should contact the user, you can use the automated inserts orcanned responses and/or write your own, explaining the reason and coaching them so that the user’s next edit is perfect

The three little numbers to the right of a user’s name on the edits lists is their “karma score”, which indicates the net number of positive vs negative reviews for A (article edits), C (case edits) M, M (MCQ edits). A karma score of >10;+10 is required for edits to become automatically publically published for any of the three categories. When the karma score in one of A, C or M is less than or equal to ≤+10 it is in red, and when it is +11 or more it turns a light grey.

A karma score can only be seen by editors. Normal logged-in contributors cannot see it.

Common style guide errors

The style guide that has been developed at Radiopaedia.org is one deliberately chosen to ensure clarity, consistency and quality. Below are listed some of the most common errors that should be kept in mind when reviewing article edits and cases:

• diagnostic certainty set at "Certain" instead of "Almost certain"
• general spelling and punctuation issues
  • incorrect case title formatting: only the first word and proper nouns should be capitalised
  • including spaces before a comma / full stop and double spacing after a full stop
  • capitalising the first letter and terminal punctuation of a bullet point
• incorrect headings and/or order (see: standard article structure)
• incorrect referencing (see: references)
  • including the in-line reference missing or after the punctuation

Practical points

• do not moderate your own edits - this defeats the purpose of peer-moderation
• bookmark the all edits page so you can easily and quickly access it; one or two reviews a day makes a huge difference
• if there is something that you are not sure about then escalate by emailingmessaging a senior or managing editor