Normal pressure hydrocephalus

Changed by Wayland Wang, 2 Sep 2014

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) remains a controversial entity with often ambiguous imaging findings. 

Epidemiology

The majority of cases of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) are idiopathic and is referred to as primary NPH. Many causes of secondary NPH exist including 3:

Clinical presentation

The classical clinical findings of normal pressure hydrocephalus are 1-3:

  1. urinary incontinence
  2. deterioration in cognition (dementia)
  3. gait disturbances

These can be remembered with the unkind mnemonic Wet, Wacky and Wobbly

As the name suggests mean CSF opening pressure in patients with NPH is within the normal range  (<18 cm H2O or 13 mm Hg) 3

A classic neurological sign in NPH is magnetic gait.

Pathology

The underlying cause of NPH remains controversial. One theory is that NPH is an obstructive type of communicating hydrocephalus due to reduced of CSF resorption. A second theory suggests that NPH results from weakening of the ventricular wall due to periventricular white matter ischemic damage 3

Radiographic features

CT

Although CT is able to visualise the anatomical changes of NPH, it is inferior to MRI. 

MRI brain

MRI is the best modality to image anatomical changes and can also add support for the diagnosis with CSF flow studies and MRS

  • ventriculomegaly 1-3
  • crowding of the gyri at the vertex (with small sulci)
  • sylvian fissures out of proportion to sulcal enlargement (which is minimal) and hippocampus and mesial temporal lobe volumes (which are near normal)
  • aqueductal flow void
    • best seen on T2 spin echo sequences14
    • Not as useful on modern MR scanners15
    • favorable outcome if shunt surgery has been suggested but other work suggests that it is an unreliable marker of actual flow 12.
  • periventricular high signal on T2 weighted sequences
  • MR spectroscopy - lactate peak in lateral ventricles
  • CSF flow studies 3
    • increased aqueductal stroke volume
      • aqueductal stroke volume is the average volume of CSF (calculated by summing the absolute values of stroke volume in systole and diastole)
      • (|forward stroke volumne| + |reverse stroke volume|) / 2
    • increased aqueductal peak velocity
    • various publications have set various normal and abnormal ranges
      • flow rate of >24.5mL/min 95% specific for NPH 9,11
      • stroke volume of 42 microL predictsshown on one paper to predict good response from shunting 10
      • stroke volume upper limit is now suggested to be variable between institutions due to intrinsic scanner differences, thus each centre should obtain their own "normal values", with the upper limit being suggested as 2x the normal16
Nuclear medicine

Nuclear medicine is less important in diagnosing NPH .Some of the features described are 

  • early detection of radiotracer in to lateral ventricles giving heart shaped appearance of lateral ventricles than a normal trident pattern13
  • persistence of radiopharmaceutical beyond 24-48 hours due to impaired absorption13
  • radiotracer doesnot extend to superior aspect of convexities of lateral ventricles13
  • retrograde CSF flow in to lateral ventricles .13

Treatment and prognosis

Treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus, once the diagnosis is established, is with CSF shunting, usually a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VP shunt). The challenge is identifying those patients which will benefit from shunting. Favourable prognostic factors include 3:

  • short duration of presurgical symptoms (less than 6 months)
  • onset of gait disturbance before dementia
  • temporary symptom relief from a CSF tap test (removal of 40ml of CSF via lumbar puncture)
  • absence of significant cerebral vascular disease
  • presence of an aqueductal flow void on T2 imaging10, 14

Etymology

It is thought ot have been initially described by the neuroradiologists Salamon Hakim and R D Adams in 1965, although it may actually have been described under a different name earlier by McHugh 4,6-7.

Differential diagnsosis

Imaging imaging differential consideration include

  • -<li>deterioration in cognition</li>
  • +<li>deterioration in cognition (dementia)</li>
  • +<li>Not as useful on modern MR scanners<sup>15</sup>
  • +</li>
  • -<li>increased aqueductal stroke volume</li>
  • +<li>increased aqueductal stroke volume<ul>
  • +<li>aqueductal stroke volume is the average volume of CSF (calculated by summing the absolute values of stroke volume in systole and diastole)</li>
  • +<li>(|forward stroke volumne| + |reverse stroke volume|) / 2</li>
  • +</ul>
  • +</li>
  • -<li>stroke volume of 42 microL predicts good response from shunting <sup>10</sup>
  • +<li>stroke volume of 42 microL shown on one paper to predict good response from shunting <sup>10</sup>
  • +</li>
  • +<li>stroke volume upper limit is now suggested to be variable between institutions due to intrinsic scanner differences, thus each centre should obtain their own "normal values", with the upper limit being suggested as 2x the normal<sup>16</sup>
  • -<a href="/articles/obstructive_hydrocephalus">obstructive hydrocephalus</a> due to mass lesion (e.g. pineal region, tectal plate, midbrain)</li>
  • +<a href="/articles/obstructive-hydrocephalus">obstructive hydrocephalus</a> due to mass lesion (e.g. pineal region, tectal plate, midbrain)</li>

References changed:

  • 14. Hayhow B, Begic F, Evans A, Velakoulis D, Gaillard F. Communicating Hydrocephalus with Reversible Cognitive Impairment. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014;48(4):379-80. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867413511547">doi:10.1177/0004867413511547</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24589982">Pubmed</a>
  • 15. Bradley W. Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics and Shunt Responsiveness in Patients with Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(6):507-8. <a href="https://doi.org/10.4065/77.6.507">doi:10.4065/77.6.507</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12059118">Pubmed</a>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.