Normal pressure hydrocephalus
Updates to Article Attributes
Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) remains a controversial entity with often ambiguous imaging findings.
Epidemiology
The majority of cases of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) are idiopathic and is referred to as primary NPH. Many causes of secondary NPH exist including 3:
- trauma
- subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH)
- intracranial surgery
- meningitis
Clinical presentation
The classical clinical findings of normal pressure hydrocephalus are 1-3:
- urinary incontinence
- deterioration in cognition (dementia)
- gait disturbances
These can be remembered with the unkind mnemonic Wet, Wacky and Wobbly.
As the name suggests mean CSF opening pressure in patients with NPH is within the normal range (<18 cmH2O or 13 mmHg) 3.
A classic neurological sign in NPH is magnetic gait.
Pathology
The underlying cause of NPH remains controversial. One theory is that NPH is an obstructive type of communicating hydrocephalus due to reduced of CSF resorption. A second theory suggests that NPH results from weakening of the ventricular wall due to periventricular white matter ischemic damage 3. The periventricular white matter ischemic change has also been hypothesized to slow the flow of CSF through the extracellular spaces, resulting in a "back-pressure" effect, leading to ventricular enlargement.
Shearing forces are exerted on the periventricular white matter as the ventricles enlarge. As the corticospinal tracts to the legs run medially, these tangential shearing forces cause gait disturbance.
Radiographic features
CT
Although CT is able to visualise the anatomical changes of NPH, it is inferior to MRI.
MRI brain
MRI is the best modality to image anatomical changes and can also add support for the diagnosis with CSF flow studies and MRS.
- ventriculomegaly 1-3
- frontal and temporal horns of the lateral ventricles most affected
- upward bowing of the corpus callosum 14
- crowding of the gyri at the vertex (with small sulci)
- cingulate sulcus sign: posterior part of cingulate sulcus is narrower than the anterior part, the divider between the two being a line drawn parallel to the floor of the 4th ventricle17
- sylvian fissures out of proportion to sulcal enlargement (which is minimal) and hippocampus and mesial temporal lobe volumes (which are near normal)
- aqueductal flow void
- best seen on T2 spin echo sequences 14
- not as useful on modern MR scanners 15
- favorable outcome with shunt surgery in the presence of this sign has been suggested, but other work suggests that it is an unreliable marker of actual flow 12
- periventricular high signal on T2 weighted sequences
- MR spectroscopy - lactate peak in lateral ventricles
- CSF flow studies 3
- increased aqueductal stroke volume
- aqueductal stroke volume is the average volume of CSF moving through the cerebral aqueduct
- calculated by summing the absolute values of stroke volume in systole and diastole and dividing by 2
- (forward stroke volume + reverse stroke volume)/2
- increased aqueductal peak velocity
- various publications have set various normal and abnormal ranges
- flow rate of >24.5mL/min 95% specific for NPH 9,11
- stroke volume of 42 microL shown on one paper to predict good response from shunting 10
- stroke volume upper limit is now suggested to be variable between institutions due to intrinsic scanner differences, thus each centre should obtain their own "normal values", with the upper limit being suggested as two times the normal value 16
- studies have shown that aqueductal stroke volume decreases later in the disease process despite clinical progression
- this has been theorized to be caused by cerebral atrophy, which indicates that the patient is unlikely to respond to shunt surgery18
- increased aqueductal stroke volume
Nuclear medicine
Nuclear medicine is less important in diagnosing NPH. Some of the features described are 13:
- early detection of radiotracer into lateral ventricles giving heart shaped appearance of lateral ventricles than a normal trident pattern
- persistence of radiopharmaceutical beyond 24-48 hours due to impaired absorption
- radiotracer does not extend to superior aspect of convexities of lateral ventricles
- retrograde CSF flow into lateral ventricles
Treatment and prognosis
Treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus, once the diagnosis is established, is with CSF shunting, usually a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VP shunt). The challenge is identifying those patients which will benefit from shunting. Favourable prognostic factors include 3:
- short duration of presurgical symptoms (less than 6 months)
- onset of gait disturbance before dementia
- temporary symptom relief from a CSF tap test (removal of 40ml of CSF via lumbar puncture)
- absence of significant cerebral vascular disease
- presence of an aqueductal flow void on T2 imaging 10
, 14,14
EtymologyHistory and etymology
It is thought ot have been initially described by the neuroradiologists Salamon Hakim and R D Adams in 1965, although it may actually have been described under a different name earlier by McHugh 4,6-7.
Differential diagnosis
The possible imaging differential spectrum includes
- normal ageing brain
- Alzheimer dementia: may show greater dilatation of perihippocampal fissures 2
- obstructive hydrocephalus: due to mass lesion (e.g. pineal region, tectal plate, midbrain)
- Lewy-body dementia: visual hallucinations and delusions are more prominent
- Parkinson disease: unilateral symptoms are important
- AIDS-dementia complex: positive HIV serology
-<li>presence of an aqueductal flow void on T2 imaging <sup>10, 14</sup>- +<li>presence of an aqueductal flow void on T2 imaging <sup>10,14</sup>
-</ul><h4>Etymology</h4><p>It is thought ot have been initially described by the neuroradiologists <strong>Salamon Hakim</strong> and <strong>R D Adams</strong> in 1965, although it may actually have been described under a different name earlier by McHugh <sup>4,6-7</sup>.</p><h4>Differential diagnosis</h4><p>The possible imaging differential spectrum includes</p><ul>- +</ul><h4>History and etymology</h4><p>It is thought ot have been initially described by the neuroradiologists <strong>Salamon Hakim</strong> and <strong>R D Adams</strong> in 1965, although it may actually have been described under a different name earlier by McHugh <sup>4,6-7</sup>.</p><h4>Differential diagnosis</h4><p>The possible imaging differential spectrum includes</p><ul>