Push back to draft
Updates to Article Attributes
Body
was changed:
Push back to draft is a feature that allows Radiopaedia.org's editors to return a published case to draft mode. Whenever a case is pushed back into draft mode, the editor is required to contact the user explaining as to why.
The decision to push back to draft is inherently subjective but there are some cases that should always be pushed back (see absolute indications below). If the edits required aare minor then the editor should make them and publish, or if more substantial edits are required then the editor should start on some of them, push back to draft and contact the user.
Absolute indications
- text
- patient details (content with patient details should be deleted)
- plagiarism
- lack of findings
- images
- poor image quality
- individual images that should be stacks
- multiple modalities in one study
-<p><strong>Push back to draft</strong> is a feature that allows Radiopaedia.org's <a title="Editorial board" href="/articles/editorial-team">editors</a> to return a published case to <a title="Draft cases" href="/articles/draft-cases">draft mode</a>. Whenever a case is pushed back into draft mode, the editor is required to contact the user explaining as to why. </p><p>The decision to push back to draft is inherently subjective but there are some cases that should always be pushed back (see absolute indications below). If the edits required a minor then the editor should make them and publish, or if more substantial edits are required then the editor should start on some of them, push back to draft and contact the user. </p><h4>Absolute indications</h4><ul>- +<p><strong>Push back to draft</strong> is a feature that allows Radiopaedia.org's <a href="/articles/editorial-team">editors</a> to return a published case to <a href="/articles/draft-cases">draft mode</a>. Whenever a case is pushed back into draft mode, the editor is required to contact the user explaining as to why. </p><p>The decision to push back to draft is inherently subjective but there are some cases that should always be pushed back (see absolute indications below). If the edits required are minor then the editor should make them and publish, or if more substantial edits are required then the editor should start on some of them, push back to draft and contact the user. </p><h4>Absolute indications</h4><ul>
-<a title="Patient confidentiality" href="/articles/patient-confidentiality">patient details</a> (content with patient details should be deleted) </li>-<li><a title="Plagiarism" href="/articles/plagiarism">plagiarism</a></li>- +<a href="/articles/patient-confidentiality">patient details</a> (content with patient details should be deleted) </li>
- +<li><a href="/articles/plagiarism">plagiarism</a></li>
-<li><a title="Image preparation" href="/articles/image-preparation">poor image quality</a></li>-<li>individual images that should be <a title="Stacks" href="/articles/stacks">stacks</a>- +<li><a href="/articles/image-preparation">poor image quality</a></li>
- +<li>individual images that should be <a href="/articles/stacks">stacks</a>
Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.