Testicular microlithiasis

Changed by Rohit Sharma, 31 Mar 2020

Updates to Article Attributes

Body was changed:

Testicular microlithiasis (TM) is a relatively common condition that represents the deposition of multiple tiny calcifications throughout both testes

The most common criterion for diagnosis is that of five microcalcifications in one testicle, although definitions have varied in the past. In the majority of cases testicular microlithiasis is bilateral.

Epidemiology

Testicular microlithiasis is seen in up to 0.6% of patients undergoing scrotal ultrasound. Some reports suggest that it may present in up to 5.6% of the general population between 17 and 35 years of age 3. Although testicular microlithiasis is present in ~50% of men with a germ cell tumour, it is very common in patients without cancer, and a direct relationship between the two has been debated. 

Associations

Clinical presentation

Testicular microlithiasis per se is asymptomatic and is usually found incidentally when the scrotal content is examined with ultrasound, or found in association with symptomatic conditions. 

Pathology

The microcalcifications are likely a marker of tubular degeneration, but not a risk factor for tubular degeneration 10.

Radiographic features

Ultrasound

Ultrasound is the modality of choice for examining the testes. Microlithiasis appears as small non-shadowing hyperechoic foci ranging in diameter from 1-3 mm. These foci are, often uniformly sized, occur within the testicular parenchyma and although usually distributed uniformly, may be distributed peripherally or segmentally 2.

One arbitrary grading system used on ultrasound is 13:

  • grade I: 5-10 microcalcifications
  • grade II: 11 to 20 microcalcifications
  • grade III: 21 to 30 microcalcifications
  • grade IV: >30 microcalcifications

It is unclear if a grading system adds prognostic value.

Treatment and prognosis

Testicular microlithiasis is in itself asymptomatic and benign. A relationship with testicular tumours, in particular germ cell tumours (GCT) is controversial. An ~8 fold increased risk of GCT in symptomatic testicles with microlithiasis has been reported (with microlithiasis found in approximately 50% of GCT cases), however, no increased risk has been found in asymptomatic testicles. It is also unclear whether early detection confers any benefit over self-exam. As such, screening is unlikely to be beneficial 1.

Some publications advise routine self-examination rather than sonographic surveillance 5 while others recommend annual ultrasound follow up when it is accompanied by other premalignant factors 6.

The European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) advises annual ultrasound follow-up until age 55, only if a risk factor is present 12 which include:

  • maldescent
  • orchidopexy
  • testicular atrophy (e.g. volume under 12 cc)
  • previous germ cell tumour 15
  • family history of germ cell tumour
  • -<p><strong>Testicular microlithiasis (TM)</strong> is a relatively common condition that represents the deposition of multiple tiny calcifications throughout both <a href="/articles/testis-1">testes</a>. </p><p>The most common criterion for diagnosis is that of five microcalcifications in one testicle, although definitions have varied in the past. In the majority of cases testicular microlithiasis is bilateral.</p><h4>Epidemiology</h4><p>Testicular microlithiasis is seen in up to 0.6% of patients undergoing scrotal ultrasound. Some reports suggest that it may present in up to 5.6% of the general population between 17 and 35 years of age <sup>3</sup>. Although testicular microlithiasis is present in ~50% of men with a germ cell tumour, it is very common in patients without cancer, and a direct relationship between the two has been debated. </p><h5>Associations</h5><ul>
  • +<p><strong>Testicular microlithiasis</strong> is a relatively common condition that represents the deposition of multiple tiny calcifications throughout both <a href="/articles/testis-1">testes</a>. </p><p>The most common criterion for diagnosis is that of five microcalcifications in one testicle, although definitions have varied in the past. In the majority of cases testicular microlithiasis is bilateral.</p><h4>Epidemiology</h4><p>Testicular microlithiasis is seen in up to 0.6% of patients undergoing scrotal ultrasound. Some reports suggest that it may present in up to 5.6% of the general population between 17 and 35 years of age <sup>3</sup>. Although testicular microlithiasis is present in ~50% of men with a germ cell tumour, it is very common in patients without cancer, and a direct relationship between the two has been debated. </p><h5>Associations</h5><ul>
  • -<li><a title="testicular granulomatous disease" href="/articles/testicular-granulomatous-disease">testicular granulomatous disease</a></li>
  • +<li><a href="/articles/testicular-granulomatous-disease">testicular granulomatous disease</a></li>
  • -</ul><h4>Clinical presentation</h4><p>Testicular microlithiasis per se is asymptomatic and is usually found incidentally when the scrotal content is examined with ultrasound, or found in association with symptomatic conditions. </p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>The microcalcifications are likely a marker of tubular degeneration, but not a risk factor for tubular degeneration <sup>10</sup>.</p><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Ultrasound</h5><p>Ultrasound is the modality of choice for examining the testes. Microlithiasis appears as small non-shadowing hyperechoic foci ranging in diameter from 1-3 mm. These foci are often uniformly sized occur within the testicular parenchyma and although usually distributed uniformly, may be distributed peripherally or segmentally <sup>2</sup>.</p><p>One arbitrary grading system used on ultrasound is <sup>13</sup>:</p><ul>
  • +</ul><h4>Clinical presentation</h4><p>Testicular microlithiasis per se is asymptomatic and is usually found incidentally when the scrotal content is examined with ultrasound, or found in association with symptomatic conditions. </p><h4>Pathology</h4><p>The microcalcifications are likely a marker of tubular degeneration, but not a risk factor for tubular degeneration <sup>10</sup>.</p><h4>Radiographic features</h4><h5>Ultrasound</h5><p>Ultrasound is the modality of choice for examining the testes. Microlithiasis appears as small non-shadowing hyperechoic foci ranging in diameter from 1-3 mm. These foci, often uniformly sized, occur within the testicular parenchyma and although usually distributed uniformly, may be distributed peripherally or segmentally <sup>2</sup>.</p><p>One arbitrary grading system used on ultrasound is <sup>13</sup>:</p><ul>

References changed:

  • 14. Trout A, Chow J, McNamara E et al. Association Between Testicular Microlithiasis and Testicular Neoplasia: Large Multicenter Study in a Pediatric Population. Radiology. 2017;285(2):576-83. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162625">doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162625</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28715257">Pubmed</a>
  • 16. Andrew T. Trout, Jeanne Chow, Erin R. McNamara, Kassa Darge, Raul Ramirez Grueso, Marthe Munden, Sarah M. Rothan, Oscar M. Navarro, Marta Tijerín Bueno, Kevin E. Bove, Kudakwashe R. Chikwava, Amer Heider, M. John Hicks, Gino R. Somers, Bin Zhang, Jonathan R. Dillman. Association between Testicular Microlithiasis and Testicular Neoplasia: Large Multicenter Study in a Pediatric Population. (2017) Radiology. 285 (2): 576-583. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162625">doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162625</a> - <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28715257">Pubmed</a> <span class="ref_v4"></span>

ADVERTISEMENT: Supporters see fewer/no ads

Updating… Please wait.

 Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.

 Thank you for updating your details.