Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma
Diagnosis certain
Updates to Case Attributes
Body
was changed:
Histology comment:
I think it fits best with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. The majoralternative diagnosis would be small cell carcinoma, and I thought that thenuclear morphology, with many cells having prominent nucleoli and some have atleast moderate amounts of cytoplasm, was very much against that diagnosis. Themorphology and immunohistochemical staining pattern are entirely consistent withsinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. I did not think the morphology was correctfor lymphoepithelial carcinoma.
-<h4>Histology comment:</h4><p>I think it fits best with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. The major-alternative diagnosis would be small cell carcinoma, and I thought that the-nuclear morphology, with many cells having prominent nucleoli and some have at-least moderate amounts of cytoplasm, was very much against that diagnosis. The-morphology and immunohistochemical staining pattern are entirely consistent with-sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. I did not think the morphology was correct-for lymphoepithelial carcinoma. </p>- +<p>Histology comment:</p><p>I think it fits best with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. The major alternative diagnosis would be small cell carcinoma, and I thought that the nuclear morphology, with many cells having prominent nucleoli and some have at least moderate amounts of cytoplasm, was very much against that diagnosis. The morphology and immunohistochemical staining pattern are entirely consistent with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. I did not think the morphology was correct for lymphoepithelial carcinoma.</p>
Updates to Study Attributes
Images Changes:
Image CT (C+ arterial phase) ( update )
Description
was removed:
Image CT (C+ arterial phase) ( update )
Description
was removed:
Image CT (bone window) ( update )
Description
was removed:
Image CT (bone window) ( update )
Description
was removed:
Unable to process the form. Check for errors and try again.